Cloud-Native Event-Driven Orchestration Architecture for Real-Time Fraud and Sanctions Screening

Authors

  • Juwaria Naaz Sr Data Engineer, USA. Author
  • Hani Patel Software Engineer II, USA. Author
  • Zaheer Syed Sr Software Engineer, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V8I4P102

Keywords:

Cloud-Native Computing, Event-Driven Architecture, Fraud Detection, Sanctions Screening, Financial Crime Prevention, Microservices, Real-Time Analytics, Distributed Systems, Financial Technology, Risk Assessment

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation of financial services has significantly increased transaction volumes and complexity, exposing financial institutions to growing risks such as fraud, money laundering, identity theft, terrorist financing, and sanctions violations. Traditional centralized fraud detection systems are unable to meet the real-time scalability, latency, and compliance requirements of modern cloud-based financial platforms. This paper proposes a Cloud-Native Event-Driven Orchestration Architecture that integrates event streaming, microservices, AI-driven fraud detection, sanctions screening, risk scoring, and automated decision-making into a unified, scalable framework. The architecture continuously processes transaction events, enriches contextual information, performs real-time fraud and sanctions analysis, and routes transactions for approval, rejection, or manual review. It also incorporates monitoring, observability, fault tolerance, and dynamic resource management to ensure high availability. Mathematical models for fraud risk, sanctions similarity, and orchestration efficiency support quantitative evaluation using metrics such as detection accuracy, latency, throughput, scalability, compliance, and reliability. The proposed framework delivers faster processing, improved fraud detection, stronger regulatory compliance, and greater operational resilience for next-generation financial systems.

References

[1] Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004). A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial intelligence review, 22(2), 85-126.

[2] Chan, P. K., & Stolfo, S. J. (1998, August). Toward Scalable Learning with Non-Uniform Class and Cost Distributions: A Case Study in Credit Card Fraud Detection. In KDD (Vol. 98, pp. 164-168).

[3] Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical science, 17(3), 235-255.

[4] Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011). Data mining for credit card fraud: A comparative study. Decision support systems, 50(3), 602-613.

[5] Rawat, D. B., & Bajracharya, C. (2015). Cyber security for smart grid systems: Status, challenges and perspectives. SoutheastCon 2015, 1-6.

[6] Kleppmann, M. (2017). Designing data-intensive applications: The big ideas behind reliable, scalable, and maintainable systems. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

[7] Burns, B., Grant, B., Oppenheimer, D., Brewer, E., & Wilkes, J. (2016). Borg, omega, and kubernetes. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 50-57.

[8] Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendonça, N. C., Lewis, J., & Tilkov, S. (2018). Microservices: The journey so far and challenges ahead. IEEE Software, 35(3), 24-35.

[9] Dragoni, N., Giallorenzo, S., Lafuente, A. L., Mazzara, M., Montesi, F., Mustafin, R., & Safina, L. (2017). Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Present and ulterior software engineering, 195-216.

[10] Newman, S. (2021). Building microservices: designing fine-grained systems. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

[11] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

[12] Wang, W., Sheng, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, X., Ye, X., Huang, Y., & Zhu, M. (2017). HAST-IDS: Learning hierarchical spatial-temporal features using deep neural networks to improve intrusion detection. IEEE access, 6, 1792-1806.

[13] Malkoochi, R. (2025). Event-driven fraud detection system: A cloud-native architecture for real-time transaction analysis. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 15(2), 1684-1693.

[14] Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2020). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 32(1), 4-24.

[15] West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Computers & security, 57, 47-66.

[16] Raj, P., Vanga, S., & Chaudhary, A. (2022). Cloud-Native Computing: How to design, develop, and secure microservices and event-driven applications. John Wiley & Sons.

[17] Chen, Z., Van Khoa, L. D., Teoh, E. N., Nazir, A., Karuppiah, E. K., & Lam, K. S. (2018). Machine learning techniques for anti-money laundering (AML) solutions in suspicious transaction detection: a review. Knowledge and Information Systems, 57(2), 245-285.

[18] Katta, T. B. (2022). Cloud-native integration frameworks for modern enterprises: Driving scalable and resilient digital transformation. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(3), 4926-4938.

[19] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep learning (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-800). Cambridge: MIT press.

[20] Kousaridas, A., Parissis, G., & Apostolopoulos, T. (2008). An open financial services architecture based on the use of intelligent mobile devices. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(2), 232-246.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
J. Naaz, H. Patel, and Z. Syed, “Cloud-Native Event-Driven Orchestration Architecture for Real-Time Fraud and Sanctions Screening”, AIJCST, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 12–24, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V8I4P102.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 252

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.